The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.
These 2-foot, 2-fold slide rules are endlessly fascinating.
Timber merchant's (?) rule by James Tree
Last updated 2 July 2008, David Green
This is a rule made by James Tree. It is a sort of carpenter's rule on
steroids. It has the normal four Gunter scales (A, B, C and D) with D as a
girt line. It also has an ivory slide and six tables, which are
. load table (cost per 50 cubic feet in pounds,
shillings and pence),
. SQR SCANTLINS TO A LOAD,
. THICK STUFF 12 INS BROAD,
. PLANK,
. TREENILS,
. ASH LOAD,
The tables get progressively more obscure.
So what trade was it made for and how old is it?
How old?
Annotation is: J. TREE MAKER 22 CHARLOTTE ST BLACKFRs RD LONDON
According to Peter Hopp's book [Ref 7 p76],
James Tree & Co 1850-1895
1850-1851 22 Little Charlotte St, Blackfriars, London (as James
Tree)
1851-1895 22 Little Charlotte St (as James Tree & Co)
I have one other rule made by Tree, and it is indeed annotated "& CO"
J. TREE & CO MAKERS CHARLOTTE ST BLACKFRs RD LONDON
If Tree consistently inscribed his rules "& Co", perhaps this rule is
1850-1851?
The rule has a 50 cu ft load table. Philip Stanley [Ref 8
(p168)] says "these tables are only found on English rules, and indicate a
date prior to the middle of the 19th century"
Supports the notion that this rule is 1850-1851?
Load Table
ie. (L S D)=D*50/240 where D = pence/cu.ft. and (L S D) is pounds, shillings
and pence.
Looks like standard table of the cost of 50 cu.ft. loads, and it appears
to be correct. The table runs from 18 pence to 30 pence.
SQR SCANTLINS TO A LOAD
- table - comments
- IN FT IN cu.ft.
'better' factors
- 12 50 50
- 11½ 54 4¾ 49.957
54 5¼ 49.995 is better
- 11 60 . . 50.417
59 6 49.997
makes more sense
- 10½ 65 3½ 49.989
65 3¾ 50.005 is better
- 10 72 . . 50
- 9½ 80 . . 50.139
79 9¼ 49.995 makes more sense
- 9 88 10 49.969
88 10¾ 50.004 is better
- 8½ 99 7 49.964
99 8 50.006
makes more sense
- 8 112 6 50
- 7½ 120 . . 46.875
128 50.000 error
- 7 146 8¼ 49.194
146 11¼ 50.000 error
- 6½ 170 4¾ 49.995
170 5 50.001 is better
- 6 200 . . 50
- 5½ 238 . . 49.996
- 5 288 . . 50
- 4½ 355 6½ 49.998
- 3½ 387 9 32.986
587 9 50.000 error.
(IN)*(IN)*(FEET IN)/144 gives 50 cu.ft.
This is a strange table. Some
entries are to the nearest quarter of an inch, where others are to the nearest
foot. (Is there a special reason for this?) The table contains some
more-or-less serious errors. Of course, my 'corrections' have the benefit of a
calculator. They would have used a pencil and paper in 1851, (or maybe a slide
rule?)
Scantlin is not in the Concise Oxford English Dictionary, Wikipedia, or
Wiktionary. The meaning here seems just to be "a length of timber". Presumably it
is jargon/slang/early form or misspelling of scantling?
Wiktionary says scantling (plural scantlings) is
- (especially in plural) The set size or dimension of a piece of timber, stone etc., or materials used to build ships or aircraft.
- (archaic) A small portion, a scant amount.
- A small, upright timber used in construction, especially less than five inches square.
William Falconer's Dictionary of the Marine [Ref 1],
gives
SCANTLING, (echantillons, Fr.) the dimensions of any piece of timber with
regard to its breadth and thickness in ship-building.
So a possible ship-building connection?
THICK STUFF 12 INS BROAD
- table - comments
- IN FEET IN CU.FT.
- 12 50 0 50
- 11½ 52 2 49.993
- 11 54 6½ 49.997
- 10½ 57 1¾ 50.003
- 10 60 0 50
- 9½ 63 1 49.941
63 2 50.007 Error, should be 63 2
- 9 66 8 50
- 8½ 78 7 55.663
70 7 49.997 Error, should be 70 7
- 8 75 0 50
- 7½ 80 0 50
- 7 85 8 49.972
85 8½ 49.997 would be better
- 6½ 92 3 49.969
92 3¾ 50.003 would be better
- 6 100 0 50
- 5½ 109 1 49.997
- 5 120 0 50
- 4½ 123 4 46.250
133 4 50.000 Error, should be 133 4
Calculation is IN*(FEET IN)/12 = 50. Looks like a table to look up what
length constitutes a 50 cu ft. load. Contains three mis-punched characters and
two possible omissions.
PLANK
- - table - - comments
- IN LO.D D N CU.FT.
IN*D
- 4 150 3 5
50 12
- 3½ 171 0
49.875
- 3 200 4 8
50 12
- 2½ 240 0 15
50 12
- 2 300 6 23
50 12
- 1½ 400 8 0
50 12
- 1 600 12 0
50 12
- ¾ 800 16 0
50 12
- ½ 1200 24 0
50 12
- ¼ 1400 32 0 29.17
8 should be 2400
48 0, giving 50 12 ?
The Plank table seems to be a continuation of the Thick Stuff table, with
LO.D (load, in ft?) column replacing (FEET IN)column. Then calculation is
(IN*LO.D/12)=50. D is the number of IN in a foot, but why would you need it?
For strapping lengths together? And what is N?
TREENILS
- table - comments
- IN LOAD IN IN1*L IN1*L+IN2
if
- 42 1142 36 47964 48000
36 48000
- 36 1333 12 47988 48000
12 48000
- 33 1454 18 47982 48000
18 48000
- 30 1600 0 48000 48000
0 48000
- 27 1777 21 47979 48000
21 48000
- 24 2000 0 48000 48000
0 48000
- 21 2285 0 47985 47985
15 48000
- 18 2666 15 47988 48003
12 48000
- 15 3200 12 48000 48012
0 48000
- 12 4000 0 48000 48000
0 48000
- 0 4320 0 0
Calculation: IN1*LOAD + IN2 = 48000. This works perfectly if we assume 15
and 12 are punched in the wrong rows. But what does it mean? Why do you need to
know the remainder from the multiplication? And what is the purpose of the
last row. It looks wrong but I can't see an obvious correction. The table
could continue:
11 4363 7
10 4800 0
9 5333 3 etc
The load of 4320 implies a treenil eleven and one ninth inches long, ie.
11.111111... which is interesting but not enlightening.
One way to explain the table is to make the following three assumptions: (a)
treenils are cylindrical dowels, (b) their diameter d is 1.5 inches and (c)
pi is approximately equal to 3.2 (no calculators in those days).
Then using 30 inch treenils as an example, each treenil has a volume of
30 x pi x d2/4 = 30 x 1.8 = 54 cu. ins. or 54/1728 cu. ft.
and a load of 1600 of them has the volume 1600 x 54 /1728 = 50 cu. ft.
Treenils is not in the Concise Oxford English Dictionary, Wikipedia or
Wiktionary. But assumption (a) above pretty well confirms it is a local
or early spelling of treenail. A treenail is a wooden peg that is used to
fasten timbers in shipbuilding; water causes the peg to swell and hold the
timbers fast.
William Falconer's Dictionary of the Marine [Ref 2],
gives
TREE-NAILS, (gournables, Fr.) certain long cylindrical, wooden pins,
employed to connect the planks of a ship's side and bottom to the
corresponding timbers. The tree-nails are justly esteemed superior to
spike-nails or bolts, which are liable to rust, and loosen, as well as to rot
the timber; but it is necessary that the oak of which they are formed should
be solid, close, and replete with gum, to prevent them from breaking and
rotting in the ship's frame. They ought also to be well dried, so as to fill
their holes when they are swelled with moisture. They have usually one inch
in thickness to 100 feet in the vessel's length; so that the tree-nails of a
ship of 100 feet long, are one inch in diameter; and one inch and a half for
a ship of 150 feet.
Another possible ship building connection?
ASH LOAD
This table probably refers to loads of various items made from ash wood.
One reference enthuses: "As a timber tree, the Ash is exceedingly valuable ...
for the toughness and elasticity of its wood, in which quality it surpasses
every European tree. The wood is heavy, strong, stiff and hard and takes a
high polish; it shrinks only moderately in seasoning and bends well when
seasoned. It is the toughest and most elastic of our timbers (for which
purpose it was used in olden days for spears and bows) and can be used for
more purposes than the wood of other trees.
Ash timber ... is ... in endless demand in railway and other waggon works
for carriage building. From axe-handles and spade-trees to hop-poles, ladders
and carts, Ash wood is probably in constant handling on every countryside. It
makes the best of oars and the toughest of shafts for carriages. In its younger
stages, when it is called Ground Ash, it ... matures its wood at so early an
age that an Ash-pole three inches in diameter is as valuable and durable for
any purpose to which it can be applied as the timber of the largest tree."
[Ref 3]
- table - comments
- 30P?A C?S ? PEACHS ? PLA.CKS ?
- 60 POLES (note 6)
- 36PR SHARPS 'sharpes' are
mentioned but not described in note 3
- 100 TRANS ? (note 5)
- 180 STAND ? (note 5)
- 40CAR EXTREE cart (or carriage?) axle trees ?
(note 3)
- 50COA EXTREE coach axle trees ?
- 60PLOW BEAMS plow beams (note 4)
- 18PLOW HAND plow handles ? (note 4)
- 150CAR FELLS cart (or carriage?) felloes ? (note 1)
- 200WA? FELLS wagon felloes ?
- 300COA FELLS coach felloes ? (note 3)
- 75 PR COPS ?
(note 5)
- 500COA SPOKES coach spokes ?
What are these things? Are they commodities that will fit into 50 cu.ft.?
Notes
- Jim Willemin has suggested that fells may mean felloes, "parts of the
'rim' of a wooden wheel and often made of ash, I believe". This seems very
plausible. "*Felloe (also Felly or Fellow)* (pronounced 'felly'). The curved,
outside parts of a wheel rim into which the spokes are set. Each felloe
supports two spokes." [Ref 6]
- "The woods in this area (South Oxfordshire) provided timber for the
construction of the wheels. Beech was used for felloes, often called 'vellys'
locally. ... Ash was sold to wheelwrights and was another wood used for
felloes and sometimes spokes. Locally a trunk of ash was usually
referred to as a 'stick' - certainly I have never found any other timber so
described, although in a dictionary of woodland terms it is stated that a
stick is a felled trunk, with no specific tree mentioned (5). In the Cane End
accounts, 43 sticks of ash were sold to Thomas Green, a Caversham wheelwright,
for £9.5s." [Ref 4]
- "In 1776 at Cane End there is an account, presumably of a wheelwright,
of various felloes: '1300 coach vel' and '135 long vel'. They appear in a
general account book along with various other items such as 'extrees' which
can be presumed to be axle trees, and others which are unknown but are probably
local names for parts of wheels. If anyone knows the origin of some of these
terms I would be grateful: 100 quarters (there is a reference to '03 quarterns
of quarters' in the Cranfield inventory), 100 wood mongers, 300 clefts (these
might be the result of splitting oak for spokes as apparently the spokes were
from oak cleft in the wood from the heart of the oak where the timber is
strongest and the grain straightest. Others were 456 randmers, five sharpes,
seven pulleys and 4360 touchplanks (these may be used in the construction of
the body of a wagon)". [Ref 4]
- These days, plow is the American spelling of plough. When this rule was
made, it may have also been a valid English spelling. The following comments
are from an American web site: The *heavy plow* was known in antiquity. Pliny
described a heavy wheeled plow as having been in use in Asia Minor. The plow
was often mounted on wheels, which allowed the plowshare to be matched to the
furrow being plowed. The plow was pulled by several oxen harnessed in tandem,
or, later, by horses in tandem.
The sketch of a heavy plow below is from a 13th century Lincolnshire
manuscript. In typical medieval fashion, the perspective is not usual for us.
The handles (1), the draw pole (8), and yoke (9) are actually parallel to the
ground while the rest of the plow is perpendicular to the plow. The numbered
parts are: (1) handles, (2) plowshare, (3) mallet, (4) plow beam, (5) coulter,
(6) plow foot, (7) draw chain, (8) draw pole, and (9) yoke. (The mallet (3) is
a separate tool used to break up large clods of earth).
[Ref 5]
- For what its worth the following wheelwrights' terms are mentioned in
[Ref 6]: (COPS ?) *Copse*. An iron stay keeping the outrave in
position; (STAND ?) *Standard*. A strip of wood used to resemble panelling on
a vehicle body's sides.; (TRANS ?) *Transom*. The two main cross members of
the fore-carriage to which the forepart of the perch is fixed and which
support the fifth wheel. [Ref 6]
- Pole is one of the few familiar words in this table. We would understand
it now to mean something like 'a long, thin, rounded piece of wood', as in
flag pole, punt pole. In the table it clearly has a more specific meaning,
but what? Some candidates (none of which may the right one) are (a) "an
Ash-pole three inches in diameter" [Ref 3]; (b) "A long straight timber
connected to the front of the vehicle to which a pair of horses are attached.
[Ref 6]; (c) "An alternative name for the perch in wagon construction.
[Ref 6].
REFERENCES
- SCANTLING: William Falconer's Dictionary of the Marine © Derived from
Thomas Cadell's new corrected edition, London: 1780, page 257, 2004 at
http://southseas.nla.gov.au/refs/falc/1139.html
- TREE NAILS: William Falconer's Dictionary of the Marine © Derived from
Thomas Cadell's new corrected edition, London: 1780, page 298, 2004 at
http://southseas.nla.gov.au/refs/falc/1396.html
- A Modern Herbal, by Mrs. M. Grieve, 1931, at
http://www.botanical.com/botanical/mgmh/a/ash--073.html
- Pat Preece, South Oxfordshire Archaeological Group web site at
http://www.soagarch.org.uk/wheelwrights.html
- Paul J. Gans, The Medieval Technology Pages: The Heavy Plow, at
http://scholar.chem.nyu.edu/tekpages/heavyplow.html
- Wheelwright's Terms, by the Editor, Guild of Model Wheelwrights' web site
at http://www.guildofmodelwheelwrights.org/newsite03/techniques/terms1.html
- Peter M Hopp, "Slide Rules - Their History, Models and Makers", Astragal
Press, 1999.
- Philip E. Stanley, "A Source Book for Rule Collectors", Astragal Press,
2003.